On Sat, 01 Dec 2012, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, 01 Dec 2012, Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 01 2012, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 01 Dec 2012, Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> wrote: >>>> On Sat, Dec 01 2012, Mark Walters wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi >>>>> >>>>> Overall I like the series: I think I agree with all of Jani's >>>>> comments. >>>>> >>>>> My one extra comment is that I think we should decide on whether we also >>>>> want a sexp plist version. I think we might want one for the emacs >>>>> front-end as that currently uses plists for everything. >>>>> >>>>> If we do we might want to change the names a little, both for functions >>>>> and options (eg sexp_a and sexp_p or something). Probably a lot of >>>>> sprinter-sexp would be common to both versions. >>>> >>>> This is an important question that needs to be addressed fast: options >>>> are: >>>> >>>> 1) have options to spit both alist & plist formats >>>> 2) when converting emacs to use s-expressions, convert it to use alists >>>> 3) start using plists instead of alists in Peter's android client >>> >>> Ok I have looked at this and the changes needed to output plist (or >>> both) are pretty small: the only functions from sprinter-sexp.c that >>> need to be changed are sexp_end and sexp_map_key. The total diff from >>> alist to plist is about 10 lines. I have a version which allows both >>> (the same sprinter file creates both possibilities) and have hooked it >>> into emacs/notmuch-show.el and it all seems to work. >>> >>> (Search is more difficult as that uses the async parser; indeed even for >>> show I used sexp-at-point as suggested by Tomi which seems rather >>> underdocumented but does seem to work) >>> >>> Given the ease with which we can allow both I think that would be my >>> preference: the biggest problem is that slightly more cluttered option >>> list (i.e., we have to allow both --format=sexpa and --format=sexpp or >>> similar). >>> >>> (I can post the patch doing the above but almost all of it is modifying the >>> commands to choose alist or plist rather than modifying the >>> sprinter-sexp itself) >> >> As the diff is so small I agree that supporting 2 formats is good >> option. >> >> In case this is done I suggest that we proceed the following way: >> >> 1) Agree how we call these formats (sexpa & sexpp or something else) >> 2) Peter does his updates, including to call the format as will be decided >> 3) Mark posts his patches after Peter's work is pushed > > I think this seems a good approach. I should note that while the diff > between alist and plist is only about 10 lines I do need to duplicate > some of the surrounding code to allow both: its not huge but definitely > more than 10 lines. > > I will clean it up a little and then post (as a diff on top of Peter's > patches) just so people can judge if it looks basically acceptable. Here is my current diff: note this is just the sprinter diff: it does not contain the plumbing into the cli functions. The largest part is the duplicated create function: I couldn't persuade the compiler to let me unify this (as the static const thing needs to be constant) The patch is -U6 as this makes it easier to see what is going on. Best wishes Mark --- sprinter-sexp.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- sprinter.h | 6 +++- 2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/sprinter-sexp.c b/sprinter-sexp.c index 8401c52..51bab68 100644 --- a/sprinter-sexp.c +++ b/sprinter-sexp.c @@ -1,11 +1,16 @@ #include <stdbool.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <talloc.h> #include "sprinter.h" +typedef enum { + SEXP_ALIST, + SEXP_PLIST +} sexp_list_t; + struct sprinter_sexp { struct sprinter vtable; FILE *stream; /* Top of the state stack, or NULL if the printer is not currently * inside any aggregate types. */ struct sexp_state *state; @@ -81,26 +86,39 @@ static void sexp_begin_list (struct sprinter *sp) { sexp_begin_aggregate (sp, '(', ')'); } static void -sexp_end (struct sprinter *sp) +sexp_end (struct sprinter *sp, sexp_list_t list_type) { struct sprinter_sexp *sps = (struct sprinter_sexp *) sp; struct sexp_state *state = sps->state; - if (sps->state->in_map) - fputc (')', sps->stream); + if (list_type == SEXP_ALIST) + if (sps->state->in_map) + fputc (' ', sps->stream); fputc (sps->state->close, sps->stream); sps->state = state->parent; talloc_free (state); if (sps->state == NULL) fputc ('\n', sps->stream); } +static void +sexp_end_alist (struct sprinter *sp) +{ + sexp_end(sp, SEXP_ALIST); +} + +static void +sexp_end_plist (struct sprinter *sp) +{ + sexp_end(sp, SEXP_PLIST); +} + /* This implementation supports embedded NULs as allowed by the JSON * specification and Unicode. Support for *parsing* embedded NULs * varies, but is generally not a problem outside of C-based parsers * (Python's json module and Emacs' json.el take embedded NULs in * stride). */ static void @@ -177,24 +195,36 @@ sexp_null (struct sprinter *sp) struct sprinter_sexp *sps = sexp_begin_value (sp); fputs ("nil", sps->stream); } static void -sexp_map_key (struct sprinter *sp, const char *key) +sexp_map_key_alist (struct sprinter *sp, const char *key) { struct sprinter_sexp *sps = (struct sprinter_sexp *) sp; if( sps->state->in_map && ! sps->state->first) fputs (") ", sps->stream); fputc ('(', sps->stream); sexp_symbol (sp, key); fputc (' ', sps->stream); } static void +sexp_map_key_plist (struct sprinter *sp, const char *key) +{ + struct sprinter_sexp *sps = (struct sprinter_sexp *) sp; + + if( sps->state->in_map && ! sps->state->first) + fputs (" ", sps->stream); + fputc (':', sps->stream); + sexp_symbol (sp, key); + fputc (' ', sps->stream); +} + +static void sexp_set_prefix (unused (struct sprinter *sp), unused (const char *name)) { } static void sexp_separator (struct sprinter *sp) @@ -202,25 +232,56 @@ sexp_separator (struct sprinter *sp) struct sprinter_sexp *sps = (struct sprinter_sexp *) sp; sps->insert_separator = TRUE; } struct sprinter * -sprinter_sexp_create (const void *ctx, FILE *stream) +sprinter_sexp_alist_create (const void *ctx, FILE *stream) +{ + static const struct sprinter_sexp template = { + .vtable = { + .begin_map = sexp_begin_map, + .begin_list = sexp_begin_list, + .end = sexp_end_alist, + .string = sexp_string, + .string_len = sexp_string_len, + .integer = sexp_integer, + .boolean = sexp_boolean, + .null = sexp_null, + .map_key = sexp_map_key_alist, + .separator = sexp_separator, + .set_prefix = sexp_set_prefix, + .is_text_printer = FALSE, + } + }; + struct sprinter_sexp *res; + + res = talloc (ctx, struct sprinter_sexp); + if (! res) + return NULL; + + *res = template; + res->stream = stream; + return &res->vtable; +} + + +struct sprinter * +sprinter_sexp_plist_create (const void *ctx, FILE *stream) { static const struct sprinter_sexp template = { .vtable = { .begin_map = sexp_begin_map, .begin_list = sexp_begin_list, - .end = sexp_end, + .end = sexp_end_plist, .string = sexp_string, .string_len = sexp_string_len, .integer = sexp_integer, .boolean = sexp_boolean, .null = sexp_null, - .map_key = sexp_map_key, + .map_key = sexp_map_key_plist, .separator = sexp_separator, .set_prefix = sexp_set_prefix, .is_text_printer = FALSE, } }; struct sprinter_sexp *res; diff --git a/sprinter.h b/sprinter.h index 59776a9..9a496cd 100644 --- a/sprinter.h +++ b/sprinter.h @@ -69,9 +69,13 @@ sprinter_text_create (const void *ctx, FILE *stream); /* Create a new structure printer that emits JSON. */ struct sprinter * sprinter_json_create (const void *ctx, FILE *stream); /* Create a new structure printer that emits S-Expressions. */ struct sprinter * -sprinter_sexp_create (const void *ctx, FILE *stream); +sprinter_sexp_alist_create (const void *ctx, FILE *stream); + +/* Create a new structure printer that emits S-Expressions. */ +struct sprinter * +sprinter_sexp_plist_create (const void *ctx, FILE *stream); #endif // NOTMUCH_SPRINTER_H -- 1.7.9.1