Re: [PATCH v2] Ignore encrypted parts when indexing.

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Ignore encrypted parts when indexing.

Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 18:07:02 -0400

To: Jameson Graef Rollins, Notmuch Mail

Cc:

From: David Bremner

On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 12:14:29 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:
> It appears to be an oversight that encrypted parts were indexed
> previously.  The terms generated from encrypted parts are meaningless
> and do nothing but add bloat to the database.  It is not worth
> indexing the encrypted content, just as it's not worth indexing the
> signatures in signed parts.

Pushed.

d

• Previous message (by thread): Re: [PATCH v2] Ignore encrypted parts when indexing.

Thread:

• Jameson Graef Rollins—[PATCH] Ignore encrypted parts when indexing. [inbox, notmuch::obsolete, notmuch::patch, unread]
  • Austin Clements—Re: [PATCH] Ignore encrypted parts when indexing. [inbox, notmuch::review, unread]
  • Xavier Maillard—Re: [PATCH] Ignore encrypted parts when indexing. [inbox, notmuch::review, unread]
  • Jameson Graef Rollins—[PATCH v2] Ignore encrypted parts when indexing. [inbox, notmuch::patch, notmuch::pushed, unread]
    • Austin Clements—Re: [PATCH v2] Ignore encrypted parts when indexing. [inbox, notmuch::review, unread]
    • Tomi Ollila—Re: [PATCH v2] Ignore encrypted parts when indexing. [inbox, unread]
    • David Bremner—Re: [PATCH v2] Ignore encrypted parts when indexing. [inbox, unread]