Dan Čermák <dan.cermak@posteo.net> writes: > David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes: > >> Dan Čermák <dan.cermak@posteo.net> writes: >> >>> - on ppc64 "comparing existing to exported symbols" from >>> T360-symbol-hiding fails as well >> >> This is more-or-less known [1]. The problem is that ppc64 reports >> defined functions as 'D' in nm output. At least on ELF architectures, >> readelf -Ws is more reliable. How many people would using readelf break >> things for? Currently the test does not run on macOS, afaik. > > So it is ok if I just skip this test on ppc64? Or can anything be done > about this (I must admit that I have relatively little insight into > this)? I'd say it's OK to skip it for now. Hopefully we will fix it for the next release; I didn't want to make the switch to readelf in the late stages of a release. d _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-leave@notmuchmail.org