Re: [notmuch] Mail in git

Subject: Re: [notmuch] Mail in git

Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 17:25:00 +1000

To: martin f krafft

Cc: notmuch

From: Stewart Smith

On Sat, 21 May 2011 09:05:54 +0200, martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net> wrote:
> Has anyone worked on this since?

No, haven't had the cycles... and SSD helped a bit to delay urgency.

-- 
Stewart Smith

• Previous message (by thread): Re: [notmuch] Mail in git

Thread:

• Stewart Smith—[notmuch] Mail in git [inbox, unread]
  • Michal Sojka—Re: [notmuch] Mail in git [inbox, unread]
  • Ben Gamari—Re: [notmuch] Mail in git [inbox, unread]
    • Stewart Smith—Re: [notmuch] Mail in git [inbox, unread]
      • Stewart Smith—Re: [notmuch] Mail in git [inbox, unread]
        • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] Mail in git [inbox, signed, unread]
          • Stewart Smith—Re: [notmuch] Mail in git [inbox, unread]
  • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] Mail in git [inbox, signed, unread]
    • Ben Gamari—Re: [notmuch] Mail in git [inbox, unread]
      • Mark Anderson—Re: [notmuch] Mail in git [inbox, unread]
        • Ben Gamari—Re: [notmuch] Mail in git [inbox, unread]
          • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] Mail in git [inbox, signed, unread]
            • Ben Gamari—Re: [notmuch] Mail in git [inbox, unread]
              • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] Mail in git [inbox, signed, unread]
                • Ben Gamari—Re: [notmuch] Mail in git [inbox, unread]
                  • martin f krafft—[notmuch] nested tag trees (was: Mail in git) [inbox, signed, unread]
                    • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] nested tag trees (was: Mail in git) [inbox, signed, unread]
                    • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] nested tag trees (was: Mail in git) [inbox, signed, unread]
                    • Ben Gamari—Re: [notmuch] nested tag trees (was: Mail in git) [inbox, unread]
                      • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] nested tag trees (was: Mail in git) [inbox, signed, unread]
                        • Ben Gamari—Re: [notmuch] nested tag trees (was: Mail in git) [inbox, unread]
                          • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] nested tag trees (was: Mail in git) [inbox, signed, unread]
                            • Michal Sojka—Re: [notmuch] nested tag trees (was: Mail in git) [inbox, unread]
                              • Ben Gamari—Re: [notmuch] nested tag trees (was: Mail in git) [inbox, unread]
    • Stewart Smith—Re: [notmuch] Mail in git [inbox, unread]
      • Ben Gamari—Re: [notmuch] Mail in git [inbox, unread]
        • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] Mail in git [inbox, signed, unread]
          • martin f krafft—[notmuch] Git ancestry and sync problems (was: Mail in git) [inbox, signed, unread]
            • racin@free.fr—Re: [notmuch] Git ancestry and sync problems (was: Mail in git) [inbox, unread]
              • Jameson Rollins—Re: [notmuch] Git ancestry and sync problems (was: Mail in git) [inbox, signed, unread]
              • Ben Gamari—Re: [notmuch] Git ancestry and sync problems (was: Mail in git) [inbox, unread]
              • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] Git ancestry and sync problems (was: Mail in git) [inbox, signed, unread]