Re: [notmuch] nested tag trees (was: Mail in git)

Subject: Re: [notmuch] nested tag trees (was: Mail in git)

Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:32:22 +1300

To: Ben Gamari, notmuch

Cc:

From: martin f krafft

also sprach martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net> [2010.02.18.1548 +1300]:
> True — iff we find a way to enumerate trees referencing a given
> blob or tree so that we can walk up the hierarchy. I could look
> right now, but I am about to cross half of the globe tomorrow, so
> I have other things I should rather be doing. Sorry.

http://marc.info/?l=git&m=126646636824600&w=2
id:20100218041240.GA4127@lapse.rw.madduck.net

-- 
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
 
"although occasionally there is something to be said for solitude."
                                          -- special agent dale cooper
 
spamtraps: madduck.bogus@madduck.net

• Previous message (by thread): Re: [notmuch] Mail in git

Thread:

• Stewart Smith—[notmuch] Mail in git [inbox, unread]
  • Michal Sojka—Re: [notmuch] Mail in git [inbox, unread]
  • Ben Gamari—Re: [notmuch] Mail in git [inbox, unread]
    • Stewart Smith—Re: [notmuch] Mail in git [inbox, unread]
      • Stewart Smith—Re: [notmuch] Mail in git [inbox, unread]
        • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] Mail in git [inbox, signed, unread]
          • Stewart Smith—Re: [notmuch] Mail in git [inbox, unread]
  • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] Mail in git [inbox, signed, unread]
    • Ben Gamari—Re: [notmuch] Mail in git [inbox, unread]
      • Mark Anderson—Re: [notmuch] Mail in git [inbox, unread]
        • Ben Gamari—Re: [notmuch] Mail in git [inbox, unread]
          • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] Mail in git [inbox, signed, unread]
            • Ben Gamari—Re: [notmuch] Mail in git [inbox, unread]
              • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] Mail in git [inbox, signed, unread]
                • Ben Gamari—Re: [notmuch] Mail in git [inbox, unread]
                  • martin f krafft—[notmuch] nested tag trees (was: Mail in git) [inbox, signed, unread]
                    • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] nested tag trees (was: Mail in git) [inbox, signed, unread]
                    • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] nested tag trees (was: Mail in git) [inbox, signed, unread]
                    • Ben Gamari—Re: [notmuch] nested tag trees (was: Mail in git) [inbox, unread]
                      • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] nested tag trees (was: Mail in git) [inbox, signed, unread]
                        • Ben Gamari—Re: [notmuch] nested tag trees (was: Mail in git) [inbox, unread]
                          • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] nested tag trees (was: Mail in git) [inbox, signed, unread]
                            • Michal Sojka—Re: [notmuch] nested tag trees (was: Mail in git) [inbox, unread]
                              • Ben Gamari—Re: [notmuch] nested tag trees (was: Mail in git) [inbox, unread]
    • Stewart Smith—Re: [notmuch] Mail in git [inbox, unread]
      • Ben Gamari—Re: [notmuch] Mail in git [inbox, unread]
        • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] Mail in git [inbox, signed, unread]
          • martin f krafft—[notmuch] Git ancestry and sync problems (was: Mail in git) [inbox, signed, unread]
            • racin@free.fr—Re: [notmuch] Git ancestry and sync problems (was: Mail in git) [inbox, unread]
              • Jameson Rollins—Re: [notmuch] Git ancestry and sync problems (was: Mail in git) [inbox, signed, unread]
              • Ben Gamari—Re: [notmuch] Git ancestry and sync problems (was: Mail in git) [inbox, unread]
              • martin f krafft—Re: [notmuch] Git ancestry and sync problems (was: Mail in git) [inbox, signed, unread]