Re: [PATCHv2] emacs: derive correct timestamp in FCC unique name

Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] emacs: derive correct timestamp in FCC unique name

Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 07:45:37 -0300

To: Jesse Rosenthal, notmuch@notmuchmail.org

Cc:

From: David Bremner

Jesse Rosenthal <jrosenthal@jhu.edu> writes:


> This change is mostly a question of consistency, since the unique name
> is arbitrary anyway. But since most people use timestamps, and that was
> the original intention here as well, we might as well.

pushed.

d

• Previous message (by thread): Re: [PATCHv2] emacs: derive correct timestamp in FCC unique name

Thread:

• Jesse Rosenthal—[PATCH] emacs: derive correct timestamp in FCC unique name [inbox, notmuch::obsolete, notmuch::patch, unread]
  • Tomi Ollila—Re: [PATCH] emacs: derive correct timestamp in FCC unique name [inbox, notmuch::review, unread]
    • Jesse Rosenthal—Re: [PATCH] emacs: derive correct timestamp in FCC unique name [inbox, unread]
  • Jesse Rosenthal—[PATCHv2] emacs: derive correct timestamp in FCC unique name [inbox, notmuch::patch, notmuch::pushed, unread]
    • Tomi Ollila—Re: [PATCHv2] emacs: derive correct timestamp in FCC unique name [inbox, notmuch::review, unread]
    • David Bremner—Re: [PATCHv2] emacs: derive correct timestamp in FCC unique name [inbox, unread]