On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 04:58:16 -0400, Servilio Afre Puentes <servilio@gmail.com> wrote: > On 21 April 2010 17:03, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:27:39 +0100, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote: > [...] > > Meanwhile, another issue with the result of this series is that I now > > seem to get rendering for both the text/plain and the text/html > > alternatives when a message has both. For now, the paragraphs are > > wrapped much more nicely in the rendering of the html portion, but links > > are apparently entirely missing. The link URLs at least appear in the > > text/plain rendering, (which is pretty ugly, but at least not impossible > > to use). > > > > If we could get one version or the other working completely, then it > > would be nice to display only one. > > I think that a better approach here would be to list them as parts if > they are present, then have a [configurable] way to show only one by > default, and the other would be available to show in-line. Showing only one (with a variable allowing you to express preference) is my intention. Any non-shown parts will appear as attachments - you can save them using the button (and perhaps later view them). This can make quite a big difference in a 200 message thread with lots of 'text/plain or text/html ?' choices - using the text/plain part will improve the performance of building the show buffer significantly. > What I miss in this view sometimes is the possibility of being able to > see the structure of the thread. A way to toggle the expanded state of > the messages originally expanded when I first opened the view would do > this very nicely. Ah, so you want a "go back to how it was initially" command? dme. -- David Edmondson, http://dme.org