Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> writes:

> Test not using address deduplication. Incorporate some trivial output
> sorting tests here, as they seem to lack tests.
> ---
>  test/T095-address.sh | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 70 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/test/T095-address.sh b/test/T095-address.sh
> index 8eecb2a6a7ba..f8d902cb3a5e 100755
> --- a/test/T095-address.sh
> +++ b/test/T095-address.sh
> @@ -145,4 +145,74 @@ cat <<EOF >EXPECTED
>  EOF
>  test_expect_equal_file OUTPUT EXPECTED
>  
> +test_begin_subtest "--deduplicate=no --sort=oldest-first --output=sender"
> +notmuch address --deduplicate=no --sort=oldest-first --output=sender '*' >OUTPUT
> +cat <<EOF >EXPECTED
> +Mikhail Gusarov <dottedmag@dottedmag.net>
> +Mikhail Gusarov <dottedmag@dottedmag.net>
> +Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>

> +
> +test_begin_subtest "--deduplicate=no --sort=newest-first --output=sender --output=recipients"
> +notmuch address --deduplicate=no --sort=newest-first --output=sender --output=recipients path:foo/new >OUTPUT
> +cat <<EOF >EXPECTED
> +Mikhail Gusarov <dottedmag@dottedmag.net>
> +notmuch@notmuchmail.org
> +Mikhail Gusarov <dottedmag@dottedmag.net>

Two comments:

1) It's suprising that Mikail is first in both the newest-first and
oldest-first list. Is it easy to explain why?

2) the use of path: term is not mentioned in the description. Should it
be mentioned somehow?

d