On 2023-03-29 at 07:42 -03, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote: > Thanks for the speedy update. I hate to do this but I think the message > is now _too_ specific. Goldilocks and the three tests I guess. > > In particular, is there some reason to think that the number 54 is > stable here? I'm worried about the test being flaky if there is some > Xapian related change. Maybe just sed the number away? No worries, it's my fault. I've checked the expected status code and printed a generic error message instead. _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-leave@notmuchmail.org