On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 09:06:00 +0100, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Alternatively maybe add notmuch_database_destroy_with_flush or something
> which does give a return value. notmuch_database_close is only called 3
> times and notmuch_database_destroy lots of times so changing close is
> much less intrusive than changing destroy. But I don't know whether we
> would break any  bindings or external programs etc.
> 
> What do you think?

I think notmuch_database_close and notmuch_database_destroy should
return the status, and we update the three language bindings
and bump the soname.

Peter