Re: [PATCH v3 7/8] lib: add NOTMUCH_EXCLUDE_FLAG to notmuch_exclude_t

Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/8] lib: add NOTMUCH_EXCLUDE_FLAG to notmuch_exclude_t

Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 09:55:36 +1000

To: Tomi Ollila

Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org

From: Peter Wang


On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 13:59:57 +0300, Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20 2013, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > I think we should decide before 0.16 whether to go with this patch and
> > patch 8/8 or for Peter's suggestion at
> > id:1368454815-1854-1-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com
> >
> > Now we have an enum for the NOTMUCH_EXCLUDE possibilities (rather than a
> > bool) I think it makes sense to implement NOTMUCH_EXCLUDE_FALSE properly
> > but I am happy with either choice.
> 
> So, the choice here is to choose between
> 
> id:"1368454815-1854-1-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com"
> and
> id:"87bo8edif8.fsf@qmul.ac.uk" 
> 
> (might be hard to catch from this thread -- was easier to take from
> http://nmbug.tethera.net/status/ )
> 
> Both apply cleanly to current master ( d0bd88f )
> 
> While Peter's version surely looks simpler (and may work, didn't test atm)
> the comments Mark presents makes sense (especially the "subtlety" thing ;)
> 
> IMHO Mark's version makes future development "safer" and therefore my
> vote (or million of those) goes to id:"87bo8edif8.fsf@qmul.ac.uk"

Sure, I don't care.

Peter

Thread: