On 11/07/11 20:03 -0400, Austin Clements wrote:
> > > The convention in notmuch is to use notmuch_bool_t, TRUE, and FALSE
> > > (though, admittedly, I don't know why; avoiding C99-isms?)
> > 
> > And bool is already used at another place in message.cc:
> > 
> > 	struct maildir_flag_tag {
> > 	    char flag;
> > 	    const char *tag;
> > 	    bool inverse;
> > 	};
> > 
> > IIUC it should be changed to notmuch_bool_t too.
> 
> Yes, I suppose it should (something slipped by cworth's eagle-eyed
> reviews!).  Though that appears to be the sole use of bool in all of
> libnotmuch.

I wonder if this is due to incompatible definitions of type bool in C99 and
C++. In that case this is probably harmless since struct maildir_flag_tag is
only visible from message.cc. Anyway, I'm sending a conversion patch together
with the updated series to make it clearer for Carl.

Thanks,

Louis