Quoting Michael J Gruber (2021-05-17 09:33:13)
> Patrick Totzke venit, vidit, dixit 2021-05-17 09:08:31:
> > ```
> > [~] git clone https://git.khirnov.net/alot.git             
> > Cloning into 'alot'...                        
> > fatal: unable to access 'https://git.khirnov.net/alot.git/': server certificate verification failed. CAfile: none CRLfile: none
> > [~] git clone git://git.khirnov.net/alot.git
> > 
> > Cloning into 'alot'...
> > 
> > (times out)
> > ```
> 
> It is unauthenticated git protocol:
> 
> git clone git://git.khirnov.net/alot.git
> 
> I can fully understand why someone wants to host their personal stuff
> for themselves. I still don't understand why a git-fork of a
> github-project which asks for upstreaming or collaboration is not at
> github - and yes, you can 's/github/yourchoice/' in that sentence ;)

Because at this point it is still "my personal stuff". If and when it
actually becomes "upstreaming or collaboration", I can also push it
elsewhere, as needed. I am not super fundamentalist in my religion.

But for the time being I see no big difference between people cloning
from my git server vs people cloning my repo on github.

-- 
Anton Khirnov
_______________________________________________
notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org
To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-leave@notmuchmail.org