On Mon, Oct 01 2012, David Bremner <bremner@debian.org> wrote: > Geoff writes: > > Hi David, > > I've found the source of the problem I was having. It seems to be due > to some interference with the notmuch-mua-reply function and > gnus-alias. In particular, there was a problem with the part of > notmuch-mua-reply that inserted the newly setup message contents. > > Towards the end of the notmuch-mua-reply function, there is the following code: > > ;; insert the message body - but put it in front of the signature > ;; if one is present > (goto-char (point-max)) > * (if (re-search-backward message-signature-separator nil t) > * (forward-line -1) > (goto-char (point-max))) > (insert body) > (push-mark)) > (set-buffer-modified-p nil) > > The problem is with the two lines I've marked with a *. Suppose the > main message reply buffer already contains a signature and looks like > this > > [Headers] > --text follows this line > -- > [Signature text] > > The above goes goes to the end of buffer with (point-max), then > searches back to the beginning of the signature separator, which is > fine. But then it moves one line up to the beginning of '--text > follows this line--" and then inserts the newly created message body, > which means that it inserts it before the '--text follows this > line--'. > > I've solved the problem (I think) by adjust the above code as follows: > > (if (re-search-backward message-signature-separator nil t) > (progn > (beginning-of-line) Call to `beginning-of-line' seems redundant, `re-search-backward' should move point to the beginning of the match which starts at the beginning of a line. Or am I missing something? > (newline)) > (goto-char (point-max))) -- Best regards, _ _ .o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o ..o | Computer Science, Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz (o o) ooo +----<email/xmpp: mpn@google.com>--------------ooO--(_)--Ooo--