On Wed, Mar 28 2018, Brian May wrote: > Justus Winter <justus@sequoia-pgp.org> writes: > >>> This is exactly what I have fixed in my alternative bindings which I >>> created around the end of last year [0]. So we do have an idea of how >>> to fix this, at the time I said I do believe that it's possible to also >>> do this for the existing bindings even though it is a lot of work. >>> After some talking between dkg and me we got to a way forward which >>> proposed this, but I must admit that after messing a little with getting >>> a pytest run integrated into the notmuch test-suite instead of using tox >>> I lost momentum on the project and didn't advance any further. >> >> I'm sorry that I didn't speak up when you announced your work. I'm >> actually excited about a new set of bindings for Python. I agree with >> using cffi. I briefly looked at the code, and I believe it is much >> nicer than what we currently have. > > I can into this thread late. However, my priorities for python bindings > would be: > > * I don't care about anything less then Python 3.5. > * Reliable Python 3.6 support important. > * Packages should be available from pypi.python.org Well, the 1st two should already be covered on my https://github.com/flub/notmuch/tree/cffi branch. There's obviously still room for improvement. _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch