On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 22:09:22 +0100, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote: >> I think I mentioned this on irc sometime ago: would indexing all the >> headers as a separate free text entry (under headers: for example) >> satisfy most of this. So then you could search for things like >> headers:"List-Id: blah" or similar. >> >> It is not as nice as individually indexed headers, but it does mean that >> all notmuch instances would be the same and the same commands would >> work, the library interface would be consistent etc. > I like this idea. Simple to implement, and covers all needs > automatically. It will work for some headers, but not for others. Where a header's value is a list, there will be no precise way of specifying “the list contains X”. NEAR is only an approximation. -- Alexey Feldgendler <alexey@feldgendler.ru> [ICQ: 115226275] http://feldgendler.livejournal.com