> -1 is 1969-dec-31 23:59:59 UTC > > Should we care -- and e.g. return status in separate return value ? BTW, I notice that when a message has no Date: field, notmuch reports its timestamp as 0 without reporting an error :-) -Trevor
Subject: Re: [PATCH] go: add binding for notmuch_message_get_date
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 11:39:30 -0500
To: Tomi Ollila, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Cc:
From: Trevor Jim
> -1 is 1969-dec-31 23:59:59 UTC > > Should we care -- and e.g. return status in separate return value ? BTW, I notice that when a message has no Date: field, notmuch reports its timestamp as 0 without reporting an error :-) -Trevor