Hi Pieter, On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 15:26:11 +0200, Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org> wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:48:45 +0800, Kan-Ru Chen <kanru@kanru.info> wrote: > > Bind "n" to widget-forward and "p" to widget-backward to unify the > > interface since other notmuch major mode also accept "n" and "p" to > > navigation. > > --- > > emacs/notmuch-hello.el | 2 ++ > > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-hello.el b/emacs/notmuch-hello.el > > index 6ef03bb..7def241 100644 > > --- a/emacs/notmuch-hello.el > > +++ b/emacs/notmuch-hello.el > > @@ -294,6 +294,8 @@ should be. Returns a cons cell `(tags-per-line width)'." > > (define-key map "=" 'notmuch-hello-update) > > (define-key map "G" 'notmuch-hello-poll-and-update) > > (define-key map (kbd "<C-tab>") 'widget-backward) > > + (define-key map "n" 'widget-forward) > > + (define-key map "p" 'widget-backward) > > (define-key map "m" 'notmuch-mua-mail) > > (define-key map "s" 'notmuch-hello-goto-search) > > map) > > -- > > 1.7.1 > > > > > > > Sounds logical in theory, but in practice, you'll soon get stuck > spamming "nnnnnpppnwtf" in the search field. > > That, and TAB/S-TAB feels more natural. More natural than what exactly ? Anyway, that would not hurt to add 'n' and 'p' as another way to navigate through widgets in my opinion (whatsmore that's how customize also works -i.e navigation done both with TAB/S-TAB and n/p) /Xavier