On Wed, Mar 18 2020, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > GMIME_ENCRYPT_NONE and GMIME_VERIFY_NONE have the same value, but they > are different enumerated types. So in C, this is a cosmetic change, > but it is technically correct if we only had stricter typing. Change consistent with '@@ node_verify', LGTM. Tomi > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> > --- > mime-node.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/mime-node.c b/mime-node.c > index d4996a33..e531078c 100644 > --- a/mime-node.c > +++ b/mime-node.c > @@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ node_verify (mime_node_t *node, GMimeObject *part) > > node->verify_attempted = true; > node->sig_list = g_mime_multipart_signed_verify ( > - GMIME_MULTIPART_SIGNED (part), GMIME_ENCRYPT_NONE, &err); > + GMIME_MULTIPART_SIGNED (part), GMIME_VERIFY_NONE, &err); > > if (node->sig_list) > set_signature_list_destructor (node); > -- > 2.25.1 _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch