On Sat, Mar 23 2019, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Tue 2019-03-19 07:08:19 -0300, David Bremner wrote: >> This produces tarballs that are roughly 30% smaller. > > LGTM. I can confirm that i'm seeing tarball sizes go from 924543 bytes > (or 917179 bytes with gzip -9) to 644892 bytes with this xz approach. > > I think the ecosystem that notmuch targets *can* handle .xz these days, > too. Most probably! Something related: any wisdom here: https://www.nongnu.org/lzip/xz_inadequate.html ? > --dkg Tomi _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch