On Thu, Nov 30 2017, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Thu 2017-11-30 11:08:05 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 30 2017, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> >>> On Thu 2017-10-26 18:27:51 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >>>> "notmuch help" doesn't mention "notmuch-emacs-mua" even though we >>>> support it through the try_external_command() mechanism. >>>> >>>> In addition, "notmuch help emacs-mua" doesn't work, even though we >>>> ship the appropriate manpage. >>>> >>>> This changeset fixes both of these problems. >>> >>> Ping! i don't think this patch is complex or objectionable. Can it be >>> merged? >> >> it may (*) look like we don't have #if WITH_EMACS (**) cpp macros defined ??? >> >> Tomi >> >> (*) did not check... >> >> (**) this is emacs-specific stull, less generic that other hints (if that >> matters) ... >> >> Sorry to cause confusion... > > confusion is right! i don't understand what you're saying, sorry. are > you suggesting a different change somehow? Want to propose a different > patch? My thought was that even though user may compile notmuch without emacs support (and notmuch-emacs-mua not installed) we would be hinting `notmuch emacs-mua` command to exist. Tomi > > --dkg _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch