On Wed, Oct 09 2013, Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 09 2013, ngreply <ngreply@gmx.net> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> do not know, if it's done right, but this patch fixed my compilation of >> notmuch-0.16 on OSX 10.6: >> >> diff Makefile.local.org Makefile.local >> 287c287 >> < $(call quiet,$(FINAL_NOTMUCH_LINKER) $(CFLAGS)) $(notmuch_client_modules) >> $(FINAL_NOTMUCH_LDFLAGS) -o $@ >> --- >>> $(call quiet,$(FINAL_NOTMUCH_LINKER) $(CFLAGS)) $(notmuch_client_modules) >>> util/libutil.a $(FINAL_NOTMUCH_LDFLAGS) -o $@ >> > > That is interesting; FINAL_NOTMUCH_LDFLAGS is defined as > > FINAL_NOTMUCH_LDFLAGS = $(LDFLAGS) -Lutil -lutil -Llib -lnotmuch ... > > (and, in my linux environment LDFLAGS is defined as empty string) > > In ./lib we have libnotmuch.a & libnotmuch.so but in ./util we (only) > have libutil.a -- for some reason OS X 10.6 (Snow Leopard) gcc (4.2.x IIRC) > doesn't use the static library ? > > Well, IMO having that util/libutil.a there is a tolerable workaround to get > notmuch 0.16 available in OSX 10.6... ... I mean patching the (Make)file(.local) before compiling in OSX 10.6, not committing this particular change to notmuch git. > > Tomi Tomi > >> >> The same error about missing symbols while compiling target notmuch-shared >> came up when I've tried to install notmuch via Macports. >> >> Thanks to all contributors for this great tool. >> >> Regards, >> >> Oliver