On Thu, May 21 2020, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:

> On Thu 2020-05-21 00:16:48 +0300, Tomi Ollila wrote:
>> (just tested this latest works)
>
> Thanks for looking into this, Tomi!
>
> Do you have a patch to propose?

Looked a bit (now). Somewhat complicated to make perfect (enemy of good)
change.

print_test_description could be added as first line in 
test_known_broken_ok_ (then inconsistent with test_known_broken_failure_)
or in test_ok_ just before calling test_known_broken_ok_ 
(test_known_broken_ok_ is called only once in test-lib.sh)

but it looks like test_check_missing_external_prereqs_ and
test_report_skip_ may be called before print_test_description is called
(and there may be more...)

We've accumulated quite a bit of mess during these years to the test
system, which makes it harder to do larger adjustments (and not (yet)
mentioning even larger refactorings...).

>
>    --dkg

Tomi
_______________________________________________
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch