On Thu, May 21 2020, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Thu 2020-05-21 00:16:48 +0300, Tomi Ollila wrote: >> (just tested this latest works) > > Thanks for looking into this, Tomi! > > Do you have a patch to propose? Looked a bit (now). Somewhat complicated to make perfect (enemy of good) change. print_test_description could be added as first line in test_known_broken_ok_ (then inconsistent with test_known_broken_failure_) or in test_ok_ just before calling test_known_broken_ok_ (test_known_broken_ok_ is called only once in test-lib.sh) but it looks like test_check_missing_external_prereqs_ and test_report_skip_ may be called before print_test_description is called (and there may be more...) We've accumulated quite a bit of mess during these years to the test system, which makes it harder to do larger adjustments (and not (yet) mentioning even larger refactorings...). > > --dkg Tomi _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch