On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:
> And notice, I don't think we'll need to do the "virtual tag" thing of
> associating a tag name with a search and doing the work of making
> notmuch maintain the consistency of that tag and search string. It will
> be much more clean (and shouldn't be any less fast) to just do the
> searches for the original search terms, (rather than searching for tag
> terms that were previously applied by searching for the search terms).
>
> Then tags become something that are just for manual manipulation. What
> do you think?

I like this. I think this is much cleaner than the "virtual tag" approach.

  -- Jan