Re: [PATCH v2] emacs: Make the part content available to the mm-inline* checks.

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] emacs: Make the part content available to the mm-inline* checks.

Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:00:00 +0000

To: Jameson Graef Rollins, Austin Clements, Dmitry Kurochkin

Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org

From: David Edmondson


On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:13:49 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:35:01 -0500, Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU> wrote:
> > Shouldn't we only be doing this for parts with inline (or not
> > attachment) content-disposition?  That's cheap to check.  Or do we
> > actually want things like image attachments to get inlined, despite
> > their disposition?
> 
> This is a good question, actually.  Should we just always ignore the
> disposition, and inline stuff if it's inlinable?  Should this be
> configurable?

We shouldn't inline things unless the content disposition is 'inline'.

I'll work on a fix for this, which will have nothing to do with whether
or not things are indexed.
part-000.sig (application/pgp-signature)

Thread: