Re: [RFC PATCH] show: Add support for -format=raw -body=false

Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] show: Add support for -format=raw -body=false

Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 08:23:09 +0000

To: David Bremner, notmuch@notmuchmail.org

Cc:

From: David Edmondson


On Thursday, 2021-02-04 at 22:33:06 -04, David Bremner wrote:

> David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> writes:
>
>>> I'm just nervous about more legacy formats. I think we will get the
>>> arbitrary headers thing working eventually, but I can see it might take
>>> some time.
>>
>> Are we ever likely to get rid of the raw format? I use it quite a bit,
>> and it seems to be relatively low complexity and simple to support.
>
> It isn't completely without maintenance overhead, but I agree it's not
> going away. I can live with the body=false option if you think it's
> better / more feasible than the arbitrary headers series.

At the moment I'm using the former because the latter is missing, but in
principle I think that they might fill different needs. Could we have
both?

dme.
-- 
I just bite it, it's for the look I don't light it.
_______________________________________________
notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org
To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-leave@notmuchmail.org

Thread: