On 9 June 2010 13:54, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:
[...]
> But I have seen enough people complain about it that I've been convinced
> that something is wrong about it. I'm not yet sure what the right answer
> is. But if we at least have separate commands for separate actions, then
> hopefully it wouldn't be too difficult for users to combine those
> actions.
>
> When we have one command that does several different things, then it's
> much harder for users to tweak.
>
> I suppose one option here would be a customizable variable that controls
> what happens when trying to advance "past" the last message, (do
> nothing, advance to next thread, archive current thread and advance to
> next thread)?

Or hooks. If that is not possible, I prefer small functions I can
combine when personalizing the key bindings.

Servilio