On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:24:29 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> wrote:
> On 03/26/2012 11:21 AM, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> > Does it make sense for the cli to canonicalize the content types to
> > always be lower case?  Or should it continue to just pass the content
> > type exactly as it appears in the original message?  Given that
> > consumers should parse it case insensitively, it maybe doesn't matter,
> > but it might also be nice for us to be consistent.
> 
> i think "notmuch emits the content-type in the exact form contained in
> the underlying message" is a good flavor of consistency.

Works for me.

jamie.