Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] cli: clean up gmime 2.4 vs. 2.6 conditional build

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] cli: clean up gmime 2.4 vs. 2.6 conditional build

Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 15:42:30 -0400

To: Jani Nikula, notmuch@notmuchmail.org

Cc:

From: David Bremner

Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> writes:

> This is v2 of [1]. Added comments per David's request, and while at it,
> added a third patch to conform the existing conditional build in notmuch
> show to the same style. The whole series should have no functional
> changes, and thus v2 should have no functional changes since v1. ;)
>

Pushed.

d

• Previous message (by thread): Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] cli: clean up gmime 2.4 vs. 2.6 conditional build

Thread:

• Jani Nikula—[PATCH v2 0/3] cli: clean up gmime 2.4 vs. 2.6 conditional build [inbox, unread]
  • Jani Nikula—[PATCH v2 1/3] cli: crypto: abstract gpg context creation for clarity [inbox, notmuch::patch, notmuch::pushed, unread]
  • Jani Nikula—[PATCH v2 2/3] cli: mime node: abstract decryption and signature verification [inbox, notmuch::patch, notmuch::pushed, unread]
  • Jani Nikula—[PATCH v2 3/3] cli: conform to same conditional build style as elsewhere in notmuch-show [inbox, notmuch::patch, notmuch::pushed, unread]
  • Tomi Ollila—Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] cli: clean up gmime 2.4 vs. 2.6 conditional build [inbox, unread]
    • Tomi Ollila—Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] cli: clean up gmime 2.4 vs. 2.6 conditional build [inbox, unread]
  • David Bremner—Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] cli: clean up gmime 2.4 vs. 2.6 conditional build [inbox, unread]