Re: notmuch-emacs replying produces excessive indenting on multipart/signed or multipart/mixed amil?

Subject: Re: notmuch-emacs replying produces excessive indenting on multipart/signed or multipart/mixed amil?

Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 19:37:34 -0400

To: David Bremner, notmuch@notmuchmail.org

Cc:

From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor

On Sat 2016-04-09 15:09:57 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> I don't see it in "0.21+99~gd93d377" with emacs -q. Can you try that,
> and if there is some settings issue?

did you script your test?  if so, would you mind sharing your script?
i think your emacs-fu is superior to mine.

  --dkg

• Previous message (by thread): Re: notmuch-emacs replying produces excessive indenting on multipart/signed or multipart/mixed amil?

Thread:

• Daniel Kahn Gillmor—notmuch-emacs replying produces excessive indenting on multipart/signed or multipart/mixed amil? [inbox, signed, unread]
  • David Bremner—Re: notmuch-emacs replying produces excessive indenting on multipart/signed or multipart/mixed amil? [inbox, unread]
    • Daniel Kahn Gillmor—Re: notmuch-emacs replying produces excessive indenting on multipart/signed or multipart/mixed amil? [inbox, unread]
      • David Bremner—Re: notmuch-emacs replying produces excessive indenting on multipart/signed or multipart/mixed amil? [inbox, unread]
        • Daniel Kahn Gillmor—Re: notmuch-emacs replying produces excessive indenting on multipart/signed or multipart/mixed amil? [inbox, unread]
          • David Bremner—Re: notmuch-emacs replying produces excessive indenting on multipart/signed or multipart/mixed amil? [inbox, unread]
          • David Edmondson—Re: notmuch-emacs replying produces excessive indenting on multipart/signed or multipart/mixed amil? [inbox, unread]