> One thing to think about: do we want to keep the name "pick"? If not > then now is the last sensible time to change it. I don't have any > better suggestion however. There have been some suggestions on irc and I give some pros and cons keep the name pick tree/treeview navigation view forest explorer (not serious I think) zoom I think I am happy with any of the first three. At some point later I might add a flat (unthreaded) version of pick (eg just show the matching messages in date order, like mutt's unthreaded views); I don't know if we want a name which will be sensible for that. My thoughts on the names: "pick" is not a very intuitive name, but it is established and would do the unthreaded view too. "tree" is very intuitive. It might be odd for the unthreaded view. "navigation" is intuitive and would be fine for the unthreaded view. It does seem rather long for prefixes in lisp files. Perhaps use navigation for the name for documentation but pick or tree as the list prefix? The current series no longer applies to master (since Austin's series touched the pick file). I thought it might be worth settling on a name before reposting. Best wishes Mark