Thanks for taking a look. Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> writes: > IMO it is a bit silly to scan through the whole string and use the return > value of 0 (vs != 0) to have effect. we should probably have something like > #define EMPTY_STRING(s) ((s)[0] == '\0') > and use that instead. Good point. Will put in the next version. > Also, to keep promise, mentioning 'patch' in commit message referring to > the change introduced does IMO also look silly :D Ah. Yep, agreed.