On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 00:54:16 -0700, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:
> Finally, I'm a tiny bit annoyed that now after a fresh checkout of
> notmuch and "make" that one can't easily run ./notmuch without either
> installing the library (or fiddling with LD_LIBRARY_PATH). I've got some
> ideas on how to simplify that, but I'm not sure if any are good or worth
> it.

That was admittedly a very nice feature. And as I have proposed (but not
send any patch :-)). I would argue that a --shared and a --static option
(or whatever configure standard policy is for that) would make sense
that links notmuch either dynamically or statically.

But thanks for doing this work. Much appreciated
Sebastian