On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:08:08 +0100, Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org> wrote: > > > - The previous point is a bit of a counterargument to this, but in > > I couls separate it. I made is a single patch to avoid having a > > revision with broken emacs UI (and tests). > > > I'd like to propose to always apply patch series on a *topic* branch > which would then be merged back into 'master', thus avoiding this issue > altogether whilst making it more obvious which patches belong together > (eg. for easier cross-referencing with the ML). Hi Pieter; Sorry, I must have lost the thread somewhere. What application are you thinking about, and what issue do you think that topic branches avoid? d