On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 09:24:19 -0600, Adam Wolfe Gordon <awg+notmuch@xvx.ca> wrote: > This series is the same as the one from yesterday [1], rebased onto the > current master to resolve some conflicts with Austin's chnages. Hi Adam - All tests pass but I still get the "notmuch-mua-reply: Symbol's function definition is void: remove-if" error in the GUI. I don't think I should have to manually (require 'cl) before using notmuch. Related or not, the other cl related build warning is still there too: In notmuch-parts-filter-by-type: notmuch-lib.el:219:4:Warning: Function `remove-if-not' from cl package called at runtime BR, Jani. > > [1] id:"1333240404-13076-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca" > > Adam Wolfe Gordon (4): > test: Tests for reply from alternate addresses in emacs > emacs: Fix two bugs in reply > test: Show all headers in emacs reply tests > emacs: Fix the References header in reply > > emacs/notmuch-lib.el | 7 +++- > emacs/notmuch-mua.el | 36 +++++++++++++++++---- > test/emacs | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > 3 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > -- > 1.7.5.4 > > _______________________________________________ > notmuch mailing list > notmuch@notmuchmail.org > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch