Re: [PATCH] doc/reply: Clarify how reply-to header is handled

Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc/reply: Clarify how reply-to header is handled

Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 20:39:05 -0300

To: Michal Sojka, notmuch@notmuchmail.org

Cc:

From: David Bremner

Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> writes:

> Current documentation and comments in the code do not correspond to
> the actual code and tests in the test suite ("Un-munging Reply-To" in
> T230-reply-to-sender.sh). Fix it.
> ---

pushed, sorry it took so long.

d

• Previous message (by thread): Re: notmuch-reply doesn't use Reply-To

Thread:

• Damien Cassou—notmuch-reply doesn't use Reply-To [inbox, unread]
  • David Bremner—Re: notmuch-reply doesn't use Reply-To [inbox, unread]
  • David Bremner—Re: notmuch-reply doesn't use Reply-To [inbox, unread]
    • Tomi Ollila—Re: notmuch-reply doesn't use Reply-To [inbox, unread]
    • Damien Cassou—Re: notmuch-reply doesn't use Reply-To [inbox, unread]
      • David Bremner—Re: notmuch-reply doesn't use Reply-To [inbox, unread]
      • Jani Nikula—Re: notmuch-reply doesn't use Reply-To [inbox, notmuch::bug, notmuch::fixed, unread]
        • Michal Sojka—Re: notmuch-reply doesn't use Reply-To [inbox, unread]
          • Michal Sojka—[PATCH] doc/reply: Clarify how reply-to header is handled [inbox, notmuch::patch, notmuch::pushed, unread]
            • David Bremner—Re: [PATCH] doc/reply: Clarify how reply-to header is handled [inbox, unread]
        • David Bremner—Re: notmuch-reply doesn't use Reply-To [inbox, unread]