Re: revision 3: easing access to the cryptographic envelope

Subject: Re: revision 3: easing access to the cryptographic envelope

Date: Sun, 26 May 2019 11:08:03 -0400

To: David Bremner, Notmuch Mail

Cc:

From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor


On Sun 2019-05-26 09:01:46 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> writes:
>
>> This is the third revision of the series originally posted at
>> id:20190424183113.29242-1-dkg@fifthhorseman.net (revision 2 was at
>> id:20190520032228.27420-1-dkg@fifthhorseman.net)
>>
>> This series addresses comments raised by David Bremner in his review.
>> Thanks, Bremner!
>
> I pushed this version, with 4 minor whitespace fixups (inserted spaces
> and/or deleted blank lines) that I missed in my previous review.

Thanks for these fixes, Bremner.  If you have a specific set of tooling
that you use that i can adopt to catch those kinds of coding convention
mishaps before submitting, i'd be happy to adopt it so things are
"clean".  Bonus points if it integrates into emacs via .dir-locals.el or
something :P

        --dkg
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature)
_______________________________________________
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

Thread: