Re: a proposed change to JSON output to report verification of PGP/MIME signatures.

Subject: Re: a proposed change to JSON output to report verification of PGP/MIME signatures.

Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:44:14 -0500

To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor, notmuch

Cc:

From: Jameson Rollins


On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:22:49 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> wrote:
> For clients that do not know how to interpret/display the verification
> results, i don't want the backend to incur the cost of verification that
> will be thrown away.

Aren't clients going to have to interpret/display the output regardless
of it's been verified or not?  It seems to me that understanding how to
display the verified output is really not that much more difficult than
understanding how to display the unverified output.

jamie.
part-000.sig (application/pgp-signature)

Thread: