Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> writes:

> I think the zeroth-order thing we have to do then is to have the build
> include the bindings as well.  Then everyone will be able to see
> immediately if the bindings are broken.  I wouldn't even make it an
> option, or make it an option to exclude building the bindings rather
> than to include.

OK, I can agree with this. Can we get some help from the bindings
maintainers (or other interested people) in getting this working? 
Probably configure should detect/decide what bindings to build.

d