Re: segfault using python bindings

Subject: Re: segfault using python bindings

Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 16:43:42 -0400

To: David Bremner, Rollins, Jameson, Floris Bruynooghe,


From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor

On Fri 2019-08-23 09:07:12 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Daniel Kahn Gillmor <> writes:
>> The other possibility would be to implement the old "notmuch" API on top
>> of the new one with explicitly logged deprecations. But iirc, the
>> semantics and object lifecycle/ownership issues are subtly different
>> enough that this would be a non-trivial project.  I'd be happy to be
>> wrong though, perhaps someone closer to the systems (someone actively
>> using the current python bindings on an ongoing project?) could look
>> more closely?
> IIUC, it is precisely this compatibility layer that has stalled things
> for a year or so. I don't think we can afford to wait longer.

that matches my understanding too.  i'd love to move forward with the
improved bindings, under a different name.

if someone later figures out the compatibility layer that allows
implementation of the traditional "notmuch" module api atop the
notmuch2(?)  module, then we can always reclaim the name.

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature)
notmuch mailing list