Re: [PATCH] cli: change argument parsing convention for subcommands

Subject: Re: [PATCH] cli: change argument parsing convention for subcommands

Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 10:20:44 -0700

To: David Bremner, notmuch@notmuchmail.org

Cc:

From: Jameson Graef Rollins

On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:19:17 -0300, david@tethera.net wrote:
> What to people think about this? It is a bit intrusive, but I think
> everyone is sick of writing ad-hoc argument parsing code.

The larger goal seems like a good one to me, and if this helps on that
front I certainly don't see any issues.

jamie.

• Previous message (by thread): Re: [PATCH] cli: change argument parsing convention for subcommands

Thread:

• david@tethera.net—[PATCH] cli: change argument parsing convention for subcommands [inbox, notmuch::patch, notmuch::pushed, unread]
  • Jameson Graef Rollins—Re: [PATCH] cli: change argument parsing convention for subcommands [inbox, notmuch::pushed, unread]
  • Thomas Schwinge—Re: [PATCH] cli: change argument parsing convention for subcommands [inbox, notmuch::pushed, signed, unread]
    • David Bremner—Re: [PATCH] cli: change argument parsing convention for subcommands [inbox, notmuch::pushed, unread]