On Sun 2019-05-05 07:49:16 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> My take away from that is that I should probably squash these two
> commits into one.
I've read this series and it seems reasonable to me. i agree that we
should be testing messages smaller than 4096 octets, either by squashing
the two commits into one, or by only conditionally marking the tests as
known-broken. it's not too bad to mark it known-broken conditionally if
you want to do the two-stage commit:
[ size -lt 4096 ] || test_subtest_known_broken
but it's a little weird, because it's only *actually* "known broken"
depending on your platform's buffer size -- i could test this series in
2030 on debian GNU/Hurd 15 and find that because our buffer size is now
65536 none of the tests are actually broken yet :P
I also learned some extra bash from Tomi's nit-picking review, for which
i'm always grateful. thanks, Tomi! :) And thanks Rob for finding this!
Please merge this series.
--dkg