Re: Announcing Astroid v0.11

Subject: Re: Announcing Astroid v0.11

Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2018 13:32:47 -0500

To: Gaute Hope, astroidmail@googlegroups.com, notmuch@notmuchmail.org

Cc:

From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor


On Sun 2018-02-04 18:52:22 +0100, Gaute Hope wrote:
> This is done to hide Bcc-recipients.

sure, but i'm wondering why you throw *all* keyids, instead of only the
key-ids of the bcc'ed people?

> As you say, GnuPG must try all the secret keys; but many 
> users use some sort of keyring to unlock their keys - in which case 
> the hassle is limited to a bit extra time. I don't have any stats on 
> this though!

right, but the sender can't know whether this is the case or not, i
think.

fwiw, i do agree with you that the onus is ultimately on the recipient's
MUA to fix this UI/UX disaster; but why force it on them in the case
where it doesn't actually eliminate any metadata leakage? (i.e., when
they're in To: or Cc: already, and not Bcc'ed)

      --dkg
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature)
_______________________________________________
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

Thread: