On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:36:56 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal <jrosenthal@jhu.edu> wrote: > Sorry the patch is so large: there was a lot of back-and-forth, and it > was hard to break the patches down into coherent steps. Carl, if you'd > prefer, I could send you a more granular, but confusing, series of > patches. Actually, due the listing of new files in the patch, the patch was so large that it got bounced pending moderation (13K, with a 12K limit). It's not actually as complicated as this size would make seem -- mainly just a lot of moving lines to individual files. Since I'm not sure who the mod is, I'll take this as a sign that I should try to break it down into smaller patches. Sorry for the delay.