Re: [PATCH 2/2] test: mark two tests broken on machines with 32 bit time_t

Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] test: mark two tests broken on machines with 32 bit time_t

Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 22:25:34 -0300

To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org

Cc:

From: David Bremner

David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes:

> I haven't traced the code path as exhaustively for the SMIME test, but
> the expiry date in question is larger then representable in a signed
> 32 bit integer.

pushed

d
_______________________________________________
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

• Previous message (by thread): Re: [PATCH 2/2] test: mark two tests broken on machines with 32 bit time_t

Thread:

• David Bremner—test failures on 32 bit architectures. [inbox, unread]
  • David Bremner—Re: test failures on 32 bit architectures. [inbox, unread]
    • David Bremner—Re: test failures on 32 bit architectures. [inbox, unread]
      • David Bremner—[PATCH] lib: avoid casting gint64 to time_t [inbox, notmuch::needs-review, notmuch::patch, unread]
        • David Bremner—Re: [PATCH] lib: avoid casting gint64 to time_t [inbox, unread]
          • David Bremner—[PATCH 1/2] configure: detect 64 bit time_t [inbox, notmuch::patch, notmuch::pushed, unread]
            • David Bremner—[PATCH 2/2] test: mark two tests broken on machines with 32 bit time_t [inbox, notmuch::needs-review, notmuch::patch, notmuch::pushed, unread]
              • David Bremner—Re: [PATCH 2/2] test: mark two tests broken on machines with 32 bit time_t [inbox, unread]
            • Tomi Ollila—Re: [PATCH 1/2] configure: detect 64 bit time_t [inbox, unread]
            • David Bremner—Re: [PATCH 1/2] configure: detect 64 bit time_t [inbox, unread]