David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes:

> Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> writes:
>
>>
>> Anyway, the log.gz did not show any tests failing but parallel exiting
>> nonzero possibly for some other reason. Cannot say. Probably stracing (even
>> with --seccomp-bpf) would make it happen even less likely :/
>>
>
> Thanks to both of you for your feedback / suggestions. I did read today
> that timeout exits with 124 when the time limit is reached. I haven't
> investigated further (nor do I know how the timelimit should be reached,
> since the whold build+test cycle takes about 10s on this machine.

Maybe a timeout is not so crazy. I ran a couple of trials with
NOTMUCH_TEST_TIMEOUT=0, and it eventually hung (after 6, and 110
repetitions) in T355-smime, as far as I can tell on the first test.
I'm currently running some trials to see if I can duplicate that without
parallel execution, but that of course takes longer.

d
_______________________________________________
notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org
To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-leave@notmuchmail.org