Re: [PATCH 3/5] build: optionally build python-cffi bindings

Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] build: optionally build python-cffi bindings

Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 21:06:03 -0400

To: Tomi Ollila, David Bremner, notmuch@notmuchmail.org

Cc:

From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor


On Mon 2019-11-04 23:26:25 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> how bad does out-of-tree build break with this -- do we need to do
> the same as with ruby bindings (copy sources -- do we still do so)? or does
> python provide better alternative..?

I've just posted id:20200522010359.715688-1-dkg@fifthhorseman.net to
apply the same hack as the ruby bindings here.  I welcome any better
proposals, but think we should at least have the build complete!

        --dkg
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature)
_______________________________________________
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

Thread: