Re: RFC: User-Agent header

Subject: Re: RFC: User-Agent header

Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 06:45:57 +0100

To: Sebastian Spaeth, Notmuch list

Cc:

From: David Edmondson

On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 00:12:15 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de> wrote:
> After some research, this is what I found/propose:
> ...

Please make the insertion of User-Agent optional. Some might not want
it.

dme.
-- 
David Edmondson, http://dme.org

• Previous message (by thread): Re: [PATCH] RFC: User-Agent header

Thread:

• Sebastian Spaeth—RFC: User-Agent header [inbox, unread]
  • Dirk Hohndel—Re: RFC: User-Agent header [inbox, unread]
    • Carl Worth—Re: RFC: User-Agent header [inbox, signed, unread]
      • Dirk Hohndel—Re: RFC: User-Agent header [inbox, unread]
      • Jameson Rollins—Re: RFC: User-Agent header [inbox, signed, unread]
      • Sebastian Spaeth—Re: RFC: User-Agent header [inbox, unread]
        • Dirk Hohndel—Re: RFC: User-Agent header [inbox, unread]
    • Xavier Maillard—Re: RFC: User-Agent header [inbox, unread]
  • Sebastian Spaeth—Re: RFC: User-Agent header [inbox, unread]
    • David Edmondson—Re: RFC: User-Agent header [inbox, unread]
    • Sebastian Spaeth—Re: [PATCH] RFC: User-Agent header [inbox, unread]
      • Carl Worth—Re: [PATCH] RFC: User-Agent header [inbox, signed, unread]
        • Xavier Maillard—Re: [PATCH] RFC: User-Agent header [inbox, unread]
        • Sebastian Spaeth—[PATCH 13/13] notmuch.el: Add a function to insert a notmuch user-agent header [inbox, unread]
          • David Edmondson—Re: [PATCH 13/13] notmuch.el: Add a function to insert a notmuch user-agent header [inbox, unread]
            • Sebastian Spaeth—Re: [PATCH 13/13] notmuch.el: Add a function to insert a notmuch user-agent header [inbox, unread]
        • Sebastian Spaeth—Re: [PATCH] RFC: User-Agent header [inbox, unread]
          • Carl Worth—Re: [PATCH] RFC: User-Agent header [inbox, signed, unread]