William Casarin <jb55@jb55.com> writes: > > lib/database.cc | 3 +++ > lib/index.cc | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/lib/database.cc b/lib/database.cc > index 9cf8062c..0b085b21 100644 > --- a/lib/database.cc > +++ b/lib/database.cc > @@ -297,6 +297,9 @@ prefix_t prefix_table[] = { > { "subject", "XSUBJECT", NOTMUCH_FIELD_EXTERNAL | > NOTMUCH_FIELD_PROBABILISTIC | > NOTMUCH_FIELD_PROCESSOR}, > + { "body", "XBODY", NOTMUCH_FIELD_EXTERNAL | > + NOTMUCH_FIELD_PROBABILISTIC | > + NOTMUCH_FIELD_PROCESSOR}, > }; > > static void > diff --git a/lib/index.cc b/lib/index.cc > index 3f694387..299b8770 100644 > --- a/lib/index.cc > +++ b/lib/index.cc > @@ -506,7 +506,7 @@ _index_mime_part (notmuch_message_t *message, > body = (char *) g_byte_array_free (byte_array, false); > > if (body) { > - _notmuch_message_gen_terms (message, NULL, body); > + _notmuch_message_gen_terms (message, "body", body); > > free (body); > } > -- I think you'll find you broke non-prefixed queries. Does the test suite still pass? If so, we need more tests. Anyway, if you add a second set of terms I'd be intersted how much this bloats the index. Ideally with the performance corpus so we can all reproduce the experiment. d _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch