Twas brillig at 16:39:50 04.12.2009 UTC-08 when cworth@cworth.org did gyre and gimble: CW> But when viewing an actual message, I'm still planning on having CW> notmuch just return an arbitrary filename from the list of CW> filenames associated with that message. Does anyone see any problem CW> with that? Can you think of a case where you'd really care about CW> seeing one or the other of a particular duplicated message? There might be different Reply-To fields. So I'd just return bigger dup, as it probably contains more information :) -- http://fossarchy.blogspot.com/